In the previous post, I compared the bokeh produced by the Olympus ZD 25mm f/2.8 prime to that rendered by the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 when both lenses were used with the same depth of field, framing, perspective, and output size. Given that the ZD 25mm lens was used on an E-420 and the EF 50mm lens on a 5D, this meant stopping down the Canon by two stops relative to the Olympus in each case. In response to the post, I received a request to also share comparison images from the Canon lens used at f/1.4 and f/2.8. For equal perspective, framing, and magnification, these Canon f-numbers correspond to a more shallow depth of field than the Olympus can produce with this particular lens. While I don't think this test is as useful to those interested in understanding how the different lenses draw the same picture differently, it may be helpful in understanding the relative differences in depth of field between the two formats.
In each comparison below, the aperture used is indicated on the images. Click on each image to view at the intended viewing size, then use your browser "Back" button to return. Some browser/display combinations will require two clicks to get to the intended viewing size.
Here is the Canon at f/1.4 and f/2:
Both cameras at f/2.8:
Both at f/4:
Both at f/5.6:
Additional comparisons at matched f-numbers:





ZD 25 vs EF 50 Supplement (by request)
Monday, June 23, 2008
ZD 25 vs EF 50 Supplement (by request)
2008-06-23T19:34:00-05:00
Amin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Recent Posts
-
►
2009
(119)
-
►
October
(10)
- Adobe Lightroom 3 Beta Noise Reduction
- 'Best Camera' iPhone Application
- Serious Use of Compact Camera Images in Graphic De...
- Sunday Thoughts about Gear Obsession
- Real-life ISO 1600: Panasonic GH1, G1, and Canon S...
- Canon S90 Barrel Distortion
- Canon Powershot S90 IS Initial Impressions: Build ...
- Canon S90 Now In Stock at Some Stores
- Illustration: Multi-Aspect Four Thirds Versus Stan...
- Micro Four Thirds Camera Comparison Table
-
►
September
(19)
- GRD III Impressions / Review at Wouter Brandsma Ph...
- Face Detection
- Panasonic Lumix 20mm f/1.7 Review at DPReview
- Featured Photographer: Vern Dewit
- Sigma DP2 Shootout Supplement: Bokeh
- Sigma DP2 Shootout Pt. 3 - Dynamic Range
- New Site for Micro Four Thirds Reviews
- The End of an Era
- Sigma DP2 Shootout Pt. 2 - Detailed Scene
- Short Ricoh GR Digital 3 impression
- 2010 Micro Four Thirds Lens Roadmap: What's Missin...
- Sigma DP2 Shootout Pt. 1 - Form and Function
- Update on the Sigma DP2 - Olympus E-P1 Shootout
- E-P1 - GH1 Size Comparison
- Leica M9 ISO Test at Focus Numerique
- Leica X1: A Digital Hexar AF?
- Direct View Interchangeable Lens (DVIL): The Devil...
- Which Micro Four Thirds: A Personal Rationalizatio...
- It's Official: Panasonic GF1
-
►
August
(9)
- GH1 - G1 ISO Comparison, RAW + JPEG Night Scene by...
- Powershot S90: Canon Pioneers Free Lunch
- New Canons Now Available for Pre-Order
- Canon reveals new prosumer cameras
- OT: Tamron AF 60mm f/2.0 SP DI II LD IF 1:1 Macro ...
- S.C. Hall of Fame: Canon PowerShot A95
- Five Reasons I'm Excited About the Rumoured Panaso...
- Panasonic GF1
-
►
October
(10)
-
▼
2008
(254)
-
▼
June
(16)
- Open Letter to Ricoh from Wouter Brandsma
- Ricoh GX200 Review on PhotographyBLOG
- First Ricoh GX200 review
- Ricoh GX200 Announced
- ZD 25 vs EF 50 Supplement (by request)
- Bokeh Test: Olympus ZD 25mm f/2.8 vs Canon EF 50mm...
- Sigma DP1 Close-up Lens AML-1 Review by Carl Rytte...
- Unofficial Report on Upcoming Leica Products
- How "Serious" Are You About Your "Serious Compact"...
- The Current Best Carry Everywhere Camera?
- Camera/Lens Test Photos by Kazuya Minami (digitalb...
- Olympus E-420 with ZD 25mm f/2.8 Size Comparisons ...
- GRD II and DP1 Size Comparison
- Two New Shirt Pocket Cameras – Samsung NV24-HD and...
- Serious Compacts: The Care and Feeding Of
- Hall of Fame Inductee - Fujifilm E900
-
▼
June
(16)









